New Product Development Q&A with Catapult Insights and NPD expert Gwen Ishmael

New Product Development Q&A with Catapult Insights and NPD expert Gwen Ishmael

New Product Development Q&A with Catapult Insights and NPD expert Gwen Ishmael

New Product Development (NPD) can be some of the most exciting work a researcher can do in their career. It can be thrilling to have a peek behind the curtain at what products are going to launch next– will this particular product be the next big thing? As interesting and fun as NPD work can be, it also comes with its own set of challenges.

Catapult Insights’ Jill Miller recently sat down to talk with NPD experts Justin Sutton and Gwen Ishmael about their NPD experiences and some of the joys they’ve experienced along the way. Read on as they share what they’ve learned from their trials, tribulations, and triumphs.   

New Product Development Experts

Jill: Thank you for sitting down to chat with us today, Gwen! You’re a newcomer to the Catapult Insights blog series but you are definitely not a newcomer to the New Product Development (NPD) world. Can you share a bit about your experience?

Gwen: Thanks for inviting me to join you, Jill! I’ve been working in the NPD space a really long time. My first assignment was in the mid-80s for my then-employer, the Southwest Coca-Cola Bottling Company. We recognized not all parents felt comfortable helping their children with homework, particularly math assignments. So I was charged with creating what became known as the Coca-Cola Homework Hotline – a teacher-staffed call center designed for fourth-through-eighth-grade students in our Texas and Oklahoma markets to call when they needed assistance. The hotline was active for more than 25 years, so I’d say it was a success!

Since then I’ve had the pleasure of developing new products, services and experiences for almost any category you can imagine – from candy to cars to computers.

Jill: Justin, I know NPD research is some of your absolute favorite work to do. What do you love about it most?  

Justin: I love how wide-ranging it is. There’s so much that goes into NPD, from the research that fuels need identification to the creative process behind developing solutions. Then comes the long road of go-to-market strategy development, because we don’t want to see fantastic ideas die on the vine. Without the right introduction, an idea can miss it’s time, place, or target, and that’s a shame because it can all be avoided with thoughtful planning.  

Jill: What was your favorite NPD project you’ve worked on and what made it stand out?

Gwen: I don’t really have a favorite because they’re all amazing, but one that stands out is a project I undertook for a luxury automotive manufacturer. The goal was to understand what defines “luxury” and then create a set of guidelines for the designers and engineers to reference. The work was groundbreaking and strategic, and you literally could see it reflected in the new models the manufacturer went on to develop. It’s still evident in their vehicles today. 

Justin: I tend to enjoy being part of the ideation process where ideas are born, but I’d say a recent favorite was one where Catapult Insights was brought in further downstream. We joined Delta Faucet’s VersaCurl™ project to help them determine the extent their idea intersected with real human needs. One thing I loved most was the depth to which we were able to explore the topic of curly hair and build an understanding of the human experiences it involves. There were a lot of stakeholders on the project and we built a large and diverse team to make sure Curlies’ stories, needs, and culture were accurately represented and understood, which was crucial to refining the VersaCurl™ product and introducing it to the world with appropriate fanfare. 

 

Jill: What’s the biggest mistake you see researchers make when working through the NPD process?

Gwen: I see two mistakes. The first is being myopic and not considering innovation context – meaning overlooking the environment in which the new product or service will be used and/or the reason why innovation is needed in the first place. Innovation context allows you much more permission to create and test new options. Of course, the end results must align with the client’s objectives, but on the front end you need as much relevant space to play in as possible. The second mistake is not taking existing behavior into account. You can come up with amazing innovations, but if they require a significant change in behavior, success is going to be a challenge. That’s not to say it’s impossible, but there’s going to be a good deal of effort involved.

Justin: Co-mingling research and innovation in their minds. My POV is that they are distinct, but complementary functions. For example, research is great for identifying need gaps, sizing markets, and testing messages and experiences, but innovation is a mental shift away from understanding & evaluating towards growth & creation. It uses a different part of the brain, requires different skillsets, and often we tap different people to help us with each side of the process

Jill: What are your best tips and tricks for tackling NPD work?

Justin: Be honest about your organizational boundaries. Many people are aware that the creative process can be smothered by too many restraints, but a little-known secret is that creativity also thrives when given guardrails. If you start the process with too few boundaries your ideas will be all over the map – things the organization would or could never execute on. If you have too many guardrails it chokes down your idea pipeline. It’s paradoxical, so it requires some experience to strike the optimal balance.

Gwen: I’ve really taken a liking to drilling down to fundamental humanistic needs and using them as my starting point. There are all kinds of frameworks ranging from simple to complex. The one I’ve been using recently is Dr. Kenneth Acha’s Seven Fundamental Human Needs. It’s well-structured, straightforward, and I’ve been able to apply it across lots of different categories, such as financial services, pharmaceuticals, and consumer packaged goods. 

Jill: Which step of the NPD process is your favorite and why?  

Gwen: I’m torn between the step in which you search for new opportunities and spaces in which to create something new, and the step in which you generate potential solutions. When I’m involved in only one of the two I feel a bit unsatisfied, like I didn’t give the client my best. So I’m going to fudge and say those are my two favorite parts of the process. 

Justin: Jinx! My favorites are the same. First is the really early stuff when you’re learning about people. There’s always a thrill and sense of satisfaction when I get the chance to meet someone new and deeply learn about their lives, motivations, and needs. Taking that back to find intersections with a client’s expertise is a hopeful moment that makes me feel happy to provide a spark that could grow into something more.

The second is the creative process behind solution development. I’ve designed and facilitated lots of sessions, and one that I like to think about involved a very immersive, experiential component for our clients. We planned a series of missions, tasks, and experiences for them to bridge the gap between consumer insights and ideation, essentially giving them a lived-experience to personally relate to everyday needs of their target customers. Then we staged our ideation session in a hip Austin-area Airbnb, complete with a surprise visit from an ice cream truck in the afternoon. The entire thing was a great success and I still work closely with those clients to this day.

New Product Development

Jill: What NPD work have you done that ended up in the most unexpected place?

Gwen: Justin was my partner on this project! One of the largest wireless companies was considering moving into the device space, and they asked us to create new phones for them to develop. Having worked in the telecom space in the past, we knew this was a pretty significant departure. But the company had great name recognition and a solid brand reputation, so we were excited to help. Ultimately, we created seven or eight truly unique concepts for them to consider, and their team was absolutely thrilled. Then… the company decided to remain focused solely on being a wireless carrier. 

Justin: I remember that project well. That was around 2012 and we were coming up with some really forward-looking concepts. After our carrier client decided against entering the device-manufacturing space I believe they shared our work with their partners, which is far more rewarding than watching the ideas collect dust. About half of the ideas from our work have come to market by way of Apple and Samsung at this point, which makes me happy.

Jill: What piece of advice would you give to a first time innovation/NPD client to help make their first project a success?

Justin: Jumping in might be overwhelming, but structure can help in a lot of ways. Give shape to your project and create waypoints to allow for key decisions to be made along the way. It might help to start at the end and work your way back. If you were to launch a new solution, what’s the last puzzle piece you would need? To get to that point, what would you need to know first? And so on. This is also a good time to phone a friend (or Gwen or me) who has been through the process a few times. 

Gwen: Agreed! When I was in telecom, I was asked to join my company’s New Products & Ventures Group. I was so excited – it was the part of the organization that focused exclusively on creating new-to-the-world products and services! But several of my peers advised me not to go because, “People who work on unsuccessful products don’t keep their jobs.” Of course, I went anyway and it was one of the most rewarding decisions I’ve ever made. But most people stay away from risks, especially when it comes to their careers. I’ve found that laying the journey or project as a process goes a long way in alleviating that fear. It reassures clients that milestones will be met and checks will be made, all of which helps ensure success. I also like to provide a visual of the process that they can share with others in the organization. It helps create buy-in and promotes support for their work.

Jill: Thanks again for joining me today and sharing so much of your experience! I think it’s fair to say NPD work is as challenging as it is exciting.

Justin: No doubt! When it’s done well NPD work has so much potential to help people. Knowing that our work is connecting real people to real solutions is so rewarding. 

Gwen: It’s exhilarating to see a product you’ve helped create on your local store’s shelf, or to watch the supercar you worked on pass you on the highway. It’s hard work and there can be lots of disappointments, but there’s nothing like it – especially when what you’ve created makes someone’s life better or improves the world around you.

Drop us a note at hello@catapultinsights.com if you want to learn more about our approach to NPD research or how we could help you bring your great new idea to market.

Jill Miller

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

The Importance of Flexibility in Research

The Importance of Flexibility in Research

The Importance of Flexibility in Research

The research industry is filled with people who combine discipline with curiosity. Discipline drives us to practice responsibly and maintain high standards and rigors, while curiosity pushes us to constantly learn, adapt, and evolve. It’s an interesting tension between rigidity and flexibility, and I find fellow researchers have no shortage of stories about striking a balance between the two. 

My background in both research and innovation has me leaning into the curious, flexible side, but long before my career as a researcher began, I thought I would be an engineer. Sitting down with an academic advisor, a 4-year plan was laid out for me to earn an engineering degree, but I was surprised how few options I had. “I was expecting a little more room to individualize and be creative,” I told the advisor. The response was something along the lines of “This is the one path,” so on to business school I went. Afterall, I’m wired to be as structured as I am innovative.

Fast forward 25 years and I’ve amassed a number of researcher stories of my own throughout my consulting career. And I think the reason I’m successful, and further, actually enjoy the unexpected, is because of how I am wired.

I recently worked on a qual-quant study which aimed to explore how people think and talk about a new technology embedded in a home product. This particular product is one that almost everyone in the U.S. uses daily, but some clever engineers found a way to deliver a highly scientific, yet elegant, set of new benefits. It became evident during the qualitative interviews that people were a long way from comprehending the tech integration of the product and the messaging we were testing. In other words, the messaging was not ready to move to quant testing as we had originally planned.

The pivot came midway through the qualitative interviews, as we adjusted the messages and the discussion guide to follow the emerging insights. The further we explored, the more consumer confusion we unearthed that pointed to a need to expand the marketing communications. It was like we kept shining light in new directions and continually found more critical needs to be addressed.

A second pivot in the project came as Catapult Insights and our client jointly decided a second round of qual would be more valuable than the quant we initially planned. The amazing part is that we pivoted to a new plan without losing any momentum in the project, all before the end of the initial qual phase. I won’t pull back the curtain entirely, but I will say there are many researchers I’ve worked with in the past that would have struggled (and grumbled) behind the scenes to make this adjustment. Instead, it was a smooth and easy transition for us because we worked so closely with our clients along the way.

Just Walk Out
Checkout

Another project that comes to mind was a pricing study for a personal care product. The first tricky part of this work was the novelty of the product itself, which introduced an anchoring bias in our initial Gabor-Granger results. The second tricky part about this work was that our client was entering a new-to-them space with the product, so the pricing work needed to be precise to be successful.

Luckily, we have the very best statistician who was able to identify the anchoring bias, and we consulted our client on next steps. That’s when we devised a plan to triangulate pricing through a second pricing study using a monadic testing design. The results not only were precise and impactful, but they also gave our client the confidence they needed to move forward.

And one of the first projects Jill and I did as Catapult Insights was an innovation project with an automotive client. As is the case with many projects involving ideation, we started by defining the areas of opportunity as a group, using research data to help guide our decisions. This is an all-too-often overlooked phase of ideation that sets the guiderails for solution development. Would you be shocked to hear that 7 out of 10 times the opportunities we define are NOT the same as we thought they would be? It’s true, and this project (like many others) featured a highly valuable adjustment to the problem statements we spent time ideating against.

Unexpected twists and turns are part of the research journey, and as Tyson says, “everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face.” My advice is to surround yourself with a team who can embrace reality and roll with the punches. Those who are truly great in this field are the ones who can master the art of flexibility with the science of research. 

JUSTIN SUTTON

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

Innovation During Economic Downturn

Innovation During Economic Downturn

Innovation During Economic Downturn

“When the winds of change blow, some will build walls. Others will build windmills.”

This proverb has been on my mind as signs of economic slowdown make recession an even greater possibility in 2023. There is a lot of history to prove that those who innovate during bleak times are those who springboard into success when economies rebound. I love happy thoughts, so I wanted to recount a few of these lessons on why it’s critical to pump up innovation in times like these.

innovation

The run-up to the Great Recession in 2008 was marked by notable innovations that positioned their inventors to survive and thrive. Amazon landed a bevy of new products and services just ahead of a full-blown recession. Their Kindle tablet (released in 2008) and AWS services (launched in 2006) delivered fresh solutions into a tightening market. What seemed like a risky move turned out to win the day, as Amazon’s financial performance shined amidst a sea of struggling competitors, and AWS has been the most aggressively growing piece of the company’s business.   

Around the same time, the idea for Airbnb was born. This story (which is really cool) doesn’t begin with a company that was already a success – rather it was forged in the midst of economic struggle. Founders had the idea just before the recession struck, but when things got tough their entrepreneurial spirit encouraged them to proceed. It was not an easy path, but persistence and dedication to an iterative creative process helped them land VC funding to grow rapidly.  

The interesting thing about recessionary periods is that some human behaviors acclimate to new realities. The things people find important, the experiences they value, and the ways they budget their spending can change in the wake of financial uncertainty. Identifying and understanding these shifting behaviors is not a simple task. Having the creative ability to act on emerging needs is another challenge. And to do so in times when so many others are taking a defensive stance can feel tenuous. Walls and windmills.  

There are plenty of other examples that have been talked about, from Lego to Apple. There are also some under-the-radar examples, like one of my QSR clients from years ago that decided to move to more upscale menu items during the Great Recession. While many restaurants were downgrading and literally shrinking their offerings, we helped this client see the opportunity to better serve these away-from-home diners with higher-end options they were accustomed to, but at a lower price point. Customers’ needs were served, and innovation helped our client weather the recession – win-win!

It isn’t hard to see the signs of others building windmills. A prominent example comes from Starbucks, as Howard Schultz has hinted at a forthcoming “enduring, transformative new category and platform for the company.”  Many are speculating what this might be, and I am certainly excited as both a customer and a proponent of unflinching dedication to innovation. Considering their customers’ loyalty to the brand, I presume this new experience will surprise and delight their already engaged base, and maybe convert some new customers, too.

In the end I think every organization needs to find its own path through dark times and can find success building either walls or windmills. Some will hope for the storm to blow over, but my personal preference is to follow data and insights and take a shot at my own destiny. And I love helping like-minded organizations do just that.

 

Justin Sutton

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

Subscribe to our Newsletter

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp