Insights Don’t Always Come Easy: Why Creativity Matters

Insights Don’t Always Come Easy: Why Creativity Matters

Insights Don’t Always Come Easy: Why Creativity Matters

Consumer insights leaders are constantly under pressure to deliver clarity, confidence, and direction. Stakeholders want answers yesterday. Budgets are tightening. Risk tolerance is shrinking. And the business questions we face grow more complex each year.

But here’s the truth:

There is no playbook for the hardest, most meaningful questions

And the best insights—the ones that spark action, alignment, and transformation—rarely emerge from standard methods alone. They come from the work: the digging, the reframing, the imagination, the courage to craft approaches that don’t yet exist. 

At Catapult Insights, we’ve learned firsthand that great insights don’t always come easy, and sometimes you need to be creative.

Read on to learn about our point of view—and a peek behind the curtain—on how creativity elevates the insights function and drives real impact for brand teams.

Complex Business Questions Require Creative Methodologies

Leading organizations aren’t merely asking “Which concept wins?” or “What do people prefer?”

They’re asking:

  • How do emotional mindsets share behavior along a nonlinear journey? 
  • How can we influence attachment in categories where consumers aren’t actively thinking?
  • How do we build a segmentation with personas that teams can, and actually want to, use?

Often, these aren’t solvable with a single method or a linear design. That’s why innovation in research methodology matters. We’ve witnessed this first-hand how creative combinations of approaches can drive breakthroughs.

Think:

Creativity in research must be purposeful, not aimless. It’s about architecting a design that truly matches the complexity of the problem—which often means creating something new when the obvious options fall short. 

When Constraints Tighten, Creativity Sharpens

Budget restrictions. Compressed timelines. High stakes audiences. Risk averse leadership. We’ve all been there.

Sometimes the constraints feel like they box you in, but we’ve found that sometimes they can do the opposite. They force clarity. They spark inventive thinking. 

Reflecting back, some of our most effective insights programs have been built under constraints.

For example: 

  • Limited budget? Leverage hybrid designs or unlock value from tools you already own.
  • Little time? Use fast thinking approaches or iterative cycles instead of long single-phase studies.
  • High visibility or risk? Build methodologies that bring stakeholders along on a learning journey rather than keeping insights development behind a curtain, so stakeholders feel both confident and connected. 
  • Internal pressure to “stand out”? Create immersive deliverables, interactive workshops, or mindset-based storytelling that travels through the organization and live beyond a single project. 

Research doesn’t have to be boundless to be brilliant. It has to be intentional, well designed, and aligned to the decision at hand

Creativity without Recklessness: Why Experience Matters

Our POV is simple: You can balance creativity with risk when you have the experience to know where the guardrails are.

Experience tells you:

  • When “scrappy” is smart — and when it’s not
  • When new thinking will open eyes and when it will just confuse stakeholders
  • How to build credibility with diverse internal audiences
  • How to amplify insights through activation, not just publication

It’s important to be familiar with and recognize these limits when designing creative approaches to protect the validity of the insights you gather. Otherwise, you can put your insights, and your clients at risk. 

Why This Matters More Than Ever For Insights Teams

Brand-side insights leaders are under pressure to:

  • Demonstrate strategic value
  • Deliver influence beyond the research
  • Build organizational readiness for action
  • Connect data points into clear, resonant stories

And all of that requires creativity.

As my colleagues and Human Behavior experts, Justin and Debbie, recently discussed, the most powerful insights rarely come from tightly controlled environments. They come when you loosen your control and layer methodologies that capture both what people do and what it means to them.

Creativity is the bridge between data and meaning. Between insights and activation. Between knowing and doing. 

Creativity Isn’t a Bonus

It’s a requirement for modern insights leadership, especially when the questions are tough, the stakes are high, or the path forward is unclear. 

And the insights that don’t come easy? Those are the ones worth chasing.

Drop us a note at hello@catapultinsights.com if you’re interested in getting creative to solve your biggest business challenges. 

Jill Miller

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

2025 Year End Reflections with Catapult Insights

2025 Year End Reflections with Catapult Insights

2025 Year End Reflections with Catapult Insights

Another year has flown by — not quietly, and certainly not without its fair share of growth, challenges, and moments that reminded us why we love the work we do at Catapult Insights. If 2024 was a year of exploration and connection, 2025 became a year of intensity and evolution. It pushed us to think sharper, collaborate tighter, and innovate in ways we couldn’t have fully anticipated when the year began.

As we look back, each of us brings a different perspective shaped by the segmentations we dove into, the new partnerships we forged, the shifting needs of our clients, and the ways our team showed up for one another. Beyond a recap of the past year, these reflections are a window into what fuels us as researchers, strategists, and humans.

Read on for our team’s candid take on the moments, surprises, and lessons that defined 2025, and what we’re carrying with us into an already promising 2026.

If you had to pick one word or phrase to describe your 2025, what would it be—and why?

Andre: ‘Segmentation’ or ‘Jobs To Be Done’. I’ve worked with both of these constructs in the past and are nothing new to me, but this year it was ramped up to 11. We probably worked on more segmentations in 2025 than some people will in an entire career. The JTBD framework was used in conjunction with those segmentations as an analytical lens, so we had lots of ample experience with that as well. Exhilarating work that keeps you sharp, sharp and tired, haha.

What was your proudest professional moment this year?

Jill: We set out with a goal to add 1-2 new clients per year and we added 2 amazing new brands to our client list this year. Both of those new partnerships have been fun to build as we’ve gotten to know their businesses as well as the people on their teams. It’s been a rewarding journey and I’m so excited to continue working with them for years to come. 

Justin: Agreed, and one of those new brands is a favorite in my personal life. That’s what I love so much about research and consulting – helping the companies you interact with as a customer and seeing our work lead to real-world improvements. 

What surprised you most about 2025—either personally or professionally?

Jill: That 2025 was the year of the segmentation for Catapult Insights. We set an all-time career record for me with 14 segmentations this year. No, that is not a typo, we completed 14 segmentation analyses this year. What was even more exciting that the sheer volume of segmentations is that we got to explore different types of segmentations and segment within the Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework. While I love segmentation and could do it every day, I’m looking forward to what methods 2026 will bring.

What’s one thing you learned from (or about) a teammate this year that stuck with you?

Jill: That Andre stays up until midnight despite having 2 young children and being online before 8am each day. And he doesn’t even drink coffee. I’m not sure how he does it and he won’t reveal his secret. Maybe he’s part robot. We’ll never know.

Andre: That Jill and Justin both sleep a lot more than me, haha. First a quick defense of my sleeping patterns, after potty training my eldest, I got into the groove of just staying up slightly later and taking it as ‘me time’. It’s a way to decompress and shed the day’s stress. Justin’s love for Chipotle is otherworldly, and I hope to someday love a restaurant to the same intensity. Jill’s ability to manage a household and a business is something I have always found incredible.

If you could give a shout-out to one colleague or partner for going above and beyond in 2025, who would it be and why?

Justin: Andre deserves a shout-out for always being there for me on project work. My schedule was pretty bonkers in 2025, and every time I felt there were too many plates to keep spinning Andre was there to pick up the slack. It’s liberating to know that I have dedicated teammates like him so I can focus on fieldwork. 

How did client needs or research approaches evolve this year?

Jill: “Do more with less” took on an evolved meaning this year. We had a number of our clients go through layoffs and restructuring and experienced a new level of uncertainty throughout the entire year. So not only were they faced with the typical budget cuts we usually see, they were also doing it with less of everything – fewer people, less certainty, less direction from leadership, less mental space, less stability, less patience, less ability to explore and take risks, etc. What this meant for us is that every project could feel like a ‘make it or break it’ project for our clients and their role. There was increased pressure to stand out and prove themselves. But, when you aren’t able to safely take risks it can be hard to stand out. This meant we were challenged with finding new ways to level up the research methods, insights, and actionability of the output in a risk-averse environment. It stretched us but we learned a lot and enjoyed the challenge.  

What was the most interesting trend or insight you encountered in 2025?

Justin: Heightened consumer expectations for away-from-home dining experiences. In the wake of 2020, we saw lots of focus on convenience and people focusing less on in-store experiences. Now, we’re seeing signs that the pendulum is swinging back toward differentiation through hospitality. It will be interesting to see how brands meet this reemerging need to remain competitive and stay true to their own identities.  

What’s one innovation or methodology you’re excited about heading into 2026?

Andre: All things quantitative. I like to reflect on the type of work that took the most brain power (i.e., segmentation and JTBD for this year) and channel learning and insights from those methodologies into other work. That way I can build stronger, more robust research programs for our clients using a constantly evolving set of best practices. This keeps me on my toes, while allowing for creative approaches to research questions which is basically our ethos at Catapult Insights.

What’s one goal you have for yourself or Catapult Insights in 2026?

Justin: Much of the work we did in 2025 was strategically important to our clients. These are the types of projects that shape the future of brands, not just informing tactical decisions about their products. My intention in 2026 is to stick the landing by helping those clients navigate the insights we delivered last year and reimagining how they can act upon them.

What’s one thing you hope never changes about Catapult Insights?

Jill: Our team dynamic. We all work together so well and bring different perspectives to the work we do. We aren’t afraid to challenge each other’s thinking but it is always done in a kind, respectful way and without egos. This is the first time in my career I’ve experienced this kind of supportive professional relationships where we all truly want to see each other and our company succeed.

Andre: I second what Jill said – the energy is just on a totally different level compared to other places I have been in my career. There is little to no ego, just a raw desire to see us all do the best work we can. There is open air and no dread logging in each day because I know whatever the day brings, Jill and Justin will always have my back, just as I have theirs. I like to think that this energy makes its way into our work and client interactions in a way that is easily felt by all.

LOOKING AHEAD…

As we close the book on 2025, we’re struck by how much this year has shaped the future we’re stepping into. Every challenge carried a lesson, and every project brought us closer to the kind of work we’re proud to stand behind.

If there’s one constant we hope never changes, it’s the energy we bring into our collaborations. Curiosity, camaraderie, and shared desire to do meaningful work that helps our clients move forward with clarity and confidence.

Thank you for being part of our journey this year — whether as a client, partner, friend, or reader. Here’s to a 2026 filled with new ideas, new opportunities, and the same commitment to thoughtful, human‑centered insights that guide everything we do.

THE CATAPULT INSIGHTS TEAM 

Summer Reflection – Sprinklers & Second Opinions

Summer Reflection – Sprinklers & Second Opinions

Summer Reflection – Sprinklers & Second Opinions

With Christmas approaching and the mowing season behind us, I find myself reflecting on the spring and summer months. There was one particularly relevant instance regarding my sprinklers (stick with me on this).

I was having issues with my sprinkler’s (non-existent) water pressure, so I called my usual yard maintenance company to figure out what’s wrong. They quickly diagnosed the issue: too many sprinkler heads on a single zone. For some reason that answer didn’t sit right with me and I spent some time researching things for me to do myself. But I was quickly drowning in all the learnings (home irrigation systems, pumps, water pressure, etc.) – that’s when I decided to call a 2nd company to get another opinion. They did a thorough inspection and identified the real problem: a busted shut-off valve. The repair tech swapped out the valve and voila, the water pressure improved instantly.

This experience reminded me of a key principle in market research: recognizing when doing it yourself isn’t leading to the kind of outcomes you are expecting and knowing when it’s good to go outside your realm of comfort and get a 2nd opinion.

When to call a professional

This is a rule rooted in common sense and it will differ for every organization and even by research project. Market research spans both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, each with its own frameworks and expertise. If you’re comfortable with basic surveys or interviews, you might handle some tasks internally. But for deeper insights, complex segmentations, or behavioral modeling, a professional researcher brings the tools and experience to guide you toward meaningful outcomes.

If your DIY research leaves you with more questions than answers, or if you’re overwhelmed by data, it’s not a failure. It’s a signal to bring in someone who can help you course-correct and make sense of it all.

When to get a 2nd opinion

Just like when my first call was to an organization I had used for similar work in the past, you undoubtedly have vendors and professionals you have on short dial – everyone does. But even trusted partners can miss the mark. Sometimes you need a more specialized skill set to really solve your research objectives or to answer difficult questions. While it may be more energy than going to your shortlist, giving a shot to a new vendor could open up a whole new relationship and skill set to you that you never knew you needed.

I could have stuck with the sprinkler company I had prior experience with, but that path would have had me wasting money and would have resulted in my main issue never being addressed. I took a chance on someone new, and it was absolutely the right thing to do in that situation.

Wrapping up

In any case, you can probably tell I constantly have my profession in the back of my mind as I make random connections to my career and line of work in even the most mundane of consumer experiences. At Catapult Insights, we take research seriously and are always looking for ways to broaden our horizons in terms of methodologies and approaches to better serve our clients and partners. If you’re looking to broaden your research horizons, or just want a second opinion, we’d love to chat.

 

 Andre Barroso

DIRECTOR, INSIGHTS & INNOVATION
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

Rethinking JTBD for Your Organization

Rethinking JTBD for Your Organization

Rethinking JTBD for Your Organization

2025 has been a strong year for Catapult Insights and one big highlight has been working with Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) frameworks. We’ve had the opportunity to work across client industries, countries, and varying JTBD frameworks, and learned a lot along the way.

Just as a refresher, the JTBD framework was developed by Tony Ulwick (product manager at IBM in the 80’s) and popularized by Clayton Christensen (a published professor with the Harvard Business School) as an approach to product innovation by viewing products as the solutions to consumer needs or problems. The JTBD approach to innovation is used by some of the largest companies in the world to create a portfolio of products that help consumers address their ever-evolving needs. JTBD is also a great way for organizations to understand their customer base at a deeper level which opens up possibilities for customer targeting and messaging.

JTBD frameworks are not one size fits all

Across our clients and partners, there is no monolithic approach to applying a JTBD framework within an organization. We work with major consumer and retail brands, each with unique structures, customers, products, and tailored frameworks to suit their needs. In no way is this detrimental but it is actually the best use case for the framework. Overly rigid frameworks tend to crack and buckle under pressure.

Taking your JTBD framework above and beyond

What else can you do with your JTBD framework at your organization? Anything really, your imagination is the limit. We’ve seen organizations fully adopt the framework as a consumer lens for product development and targeting, and we’ve seen clients want to adopt it mid-project as a means to dig deeper into consumer perceptions and the benefits they seek. In the latter case, we’re always happy to pivot and shift as we adopt these findings into our reporting and recommendations. There is a wide gamut of use cases for the framework at an organization, but what if you want to take it to the next level?

By viewing products and consumer behaviors through a Jobs lens, you can better understand how consumers are going to market to solve a particular need and what products are sought out. But what if you wanted to dig even deeper into your Jobs to determine if different consumer mindsets exist within each one? That’s the exact question one of our clients had this year and we turned to segmentation as our tool to answer their question.

Segmentation is a powerful analytic technique that identifies groups based on shared characteristics. It can be applied across many different settings – from segmenting consumers to segmenting occasions, or even segmenting within Jobs.

In the JTBD framework, you typically have several jobs that consumers experience, and if you’re lucky, they’re addressing them with several of your products. But are all consumers within a Job approaching it with the same mindset? And do they hold that same mindset across all of the Jobs they experience? This is where a segmentation analysis shines – you can explore the mindsets of consumers within each Job to see if they differ (in our experience, they do). And you can compare mindsets across Jobs to understand if the same mindsets exist within every Job or if different ones emerge (in our experience, there are differences). This information is invaluable as it allows an organization to create specialized marketing plans to target specific mindsets within key Jobs for more effective and customized communications which can result in increased market share and revenue.

Wrapping up

The Catapult Insights team is incredibly well-versed in segmentation research and are experts in blending quantitative and qualitative methodologies to bring every segment to life. Even our trusted partners have strong viewpoints on the topic and have shared their thoughts with us along the way.

Catapult Insights strives to accurately represent everyday people to the brands that want to connect with them – that means we need to be well versed in a variety of methodologies and frameworks to help facilitate and establish those connections. A JTBD framework is one such tool that many of our clients use to help make sense of their product and organizational strategies. I’m hoping this blog post can help plant a seed on how you can always improve on something, even if you’ve been doing it for a long time. You aren’t alone in navigating the consumer research and marketing landscape – reach out to us, we’ve got ideas on how to help.

 

 Andre Barroso

DIRECTOR, INSIGHTS & INNOVATION
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

Blending System 1 and System 2 in Design Thinking: The Power of Cognitive Balance in Innovation

Blending System 1 and System 2 in Design Thinking: The Power of Cognitive Balance in Innovation

Blending System 1 and System 2 in Design Thinking: The Power of Cognitive Balance in Innovation

Design Thinking is often portrayed as a linear process, but in reality, it’s a dance between intuition and analysis—between System 1 and System 2.

The best designers, product managers, and researchers know when to trust their gut and when to pause and reflect. They don’t choose between the two systems. Instead, they blend them.

Why Blending Matters

  • Creativity Needs Constraints: System 1 generates ideas; System 2 filters and shapes them. After establishing innovation practices at multiple firms, I can tell you that the research-on-research has proven that stronger and more plentiful ideation comes as the result of guiderails, not blue-sky ideation.
  • Empathy Needs Evidence: Intuition helps us feel what people feel; analysis helps us confirm and act on those insights. Take one step further and help stakeholders not only learn about others’ emotions, but actually experience those emotions themselves in an immersive activation session.
  • Speed Needs Structure: Rapid prototyping is powerful—but it works best when paired with thoughtful iteration. Anticipate learning moments and build in time to react and respond.

Practical Tips for Designers

The dance goes back and forth between divergent and convergent thinking. In effect, System 1 and System 2 take turns informing and guiding what comes next.

  • Call on System 1 for… ideation, sketching, and storytelling.
  • Call on System 2 for… framing customer needs, research synthesis, testing, and decision-making.
  • Build Team Awareness: Encourage teams to recognize which mode they’re in—and when to switch. We like to begin with a program-level plan, yet we remain aware that timely pivots can be crucial to success. Consider building in stage gates to make the most of your efforts and stack the deck in favor of successful outcomes.

Real-World Example

A household name in retail wanted to better serve the needs of their customers through a revamped store design and shopping experience, and the team had to navigate a complex blend of creative ideation and rigorous validation.

In the early stages, System 1 thinking dominated. The team relied on intuition to sketch out bold concepts for design elements, layout, and product/service assortment. These ideas emerged from insights we collected from previous research, empathy-driven workshops, and rapid-fire brainstorming sessions, where speed and instinct were key.

But as the project matured, System 2 thinking took the lead. Teams conducted A/B tests, analyzed behavioral data, and ran structured shopper experience studies to refine the store itself. They used deliberate, analytical processes to validate which features actually improved metrics that matter to shoppers and encourage intended behavioral shifts while lifting satisfaction.

The team’s success came not from choosing one system over the other—but from knowing when to switch. They trusted their instincts to explore, and their data to decide.

The Takeaway

Design Thinking is most powerful when it honors both the intuitive and the analytical. By blending System 1 and System 2, we create solutions that are not only imaginative—but also impactful and real.

In case you missed it, check out our post about System 1 and System 2 within research and knowing how and when to engage each for maximum success. Or you can drop us a note at hello@catapultinsights.com so we can hear what’s on your mind. 

Justin Sutton

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

The Case for System 2 Thinking: Why Deliberation and Logic Are Essential in Design Thinking

The Case for System 2 Thinking: Why Deliberation and Logic Are Essential in Design Thinking

The Case for System 2 Thinking: Why Deliberation and Logic Are Essential in Design Thinking

In case you missed it, last week’s blog explored the role of System 1 within design thinking – helping us move quickly to reach unexplored places and produce breakthroughs. But design thinking isn’t just about creativity; it’s about solving real problems. That’s where System 2 comes in.

If System 1 is the spark, System 2 is the structure. It’s slow, deliberate, and logical, which is perfect for refining ideas, validating assumptions, and making informed decisions.

Why System 2 Matters in Design Thinking

  • Problem Framing: Defining the right problem requires careful analysis of user data, stakeholder input, and constraints. Don’t skip this step. I’ve seen it happen, and the story is less likely to have a happy ending.
  • Testing and Validation: System 2 helps teams design experiments, interpret results, and avoid confirmation bias.
  • Decision-Making: When choosing between prototypes or prioritizing features, System 2 ensures decisions are grounded in evidence.

Real-World Examples

Consider a team designing a new retail shopping experience. After generating ideas (System 1), they use System 2 to analyze user feedback, examine impact on customer experience, and refine ideas based on data—not just instinct.

We did something similar with our favorite coffee client as they explored a change to a core brand symbol: their single-use cups. While we immersed customers in our client’s coffeehouse environment to ground them in System 1 experiences, we explored System 2 reactions to prototype cups through carefully crafted discussions and evaluation methods.

The Takeaway

System 2 brings rigor to the creative process. It helps teams slow down, reflect, and make choices that are imaginative AND effective. This helps separate winning ideas from pet ideas, which can save immense resources from being wasted and goes on to actually make a positive difference in the lives of real people. And that’s what Catapult Insights is all about!

The conclusion of this blog series examines the necessity for both System 1 and System 2 thought to formulate an optimized approach to design thinking. Read on in our first October post to see how it all comes together.

 

Justin Sutton

CO-FOUNDER
CATAPULT INSIGHTS

Subscribe to our Newsletter

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp